Archive for January, 2007

Can you say NFL 2K8? I know Take Two can.

And I love them for it.

Through all of the rumors of a Legends 2K game and the loss of the original series, I’ve held out hope. Now it appears it’ll actually happen. I’m so excited. Now I want details and screen shots and I want the damn Madden guys to pay attention. I’m 100% sure if the game is released, it’ll have features in it Madden hasn’t managed in the three years since 2k halted production on their games.

Heck, maybe we’ll even get a game where defense matters. I know, crazy talk.

What Would Matt Do: I’ll not to get over exicted, but damn me if I’m not already excited! I’m ready, I’m ready, I’m ready!

eBay says no more to Virtual Listings. And to money.

So it’s official, eBay hates money. On Friday it was officially declared by eBay that they will no longer be allowing the listing of virtual property.

Following up on a rumour that’s been going around I spoke today with a media representative for the company, who confirmed that eBay is now delisting all auctions for ‘virtual artifacts’ from the site. This includes currency, items, and accounts/characters; not even the ‘neopoints’ used in the popular Neopets service is exempt from this decision.

Wow. I didn’t think I’d see the day a company that is based on the idea that making money is a good thing, turn down money. Because when it comes right down to it, that’s what they are doing. So how much does this cost them? I have no idea, but WoW being pretty damn popular and there being at least a couple of other games out there (I think) that one might own virtual property in, this is have to have some impact on the bottom line.

So the point here? IGE (and others) must be cackling gleefully (as someone on BT put it). Yeah, the selling and buying of virtual property has inherent risks (i.e. - you have to trust your buyer if you’re buying outside said virtual world. We all know how trust worthy people on the internet are), but eBay delisting it doesn’t change the fact that it’s happening and will continue to happen. Heck, it just means people are going to have to go to seedier *ahem*IGE*ahem services to get their fix, or to sell their goods. At least with eBay you had a built in whining system, or as eBay calls it, Feedback, that allowed you to flag people that didn’t follow through or just basically sucked. Now you’re going to have to deal with the likes of IGE or worse, person to person transfers *shudder*.

eBay delisting virtual property does nothing more than move the problem of actual ownership off their plate and out into other arenas. Good for them, bad for people wanting to purchase crap they didn’t earn.

That being said, screw those bastards that didn’t earn their shit. Screw them all to hell! Oh wait, I really don’t care at all. I don’t care if they ground that level 70 warlock with their blood sweat and tears or paid someone else to do it. I don’t care if they bought that one meeeeeeeeeelion gold pieces or bought it off some Asian farmer. It doesn’t matter to me. Why, because it doesn’t affect my game. I’m not competing with thousands of other joes on my server, I’m playing to have fun. And anyone that buys their character isn’t going to be real competition in the battle grounds anyway.

What does matter to me is the idea of virtual property, the ownership legality, the actual laws surrounding it and where it’s heading. I think that eBay getting rid of such auctions on their site deals the whole idea of actually owning virtual property a blow, but I don’t think it will kill it.

WoW currently has 2 million US users. Wait until the MMORPG comes along that has 10 million. Then we’ll see some actual legal battles over virtual property. I can’t wait. Nothing like a good drama to really rile the people up.

UPDATE

I noticed a brand new spanking update on BT not long after I posted this. As Lum says, “we live in interesting times.” I agree completely. Nothing like virtual property to start a good internet drama. My favorite kind.

Also, eBay, wtf? Delisting some and not others? Now you’re looking either shoddy or in bed with some peeps. Way to go all Haliburton on us.

What Would Matt Do: I should buy stock in IGE. They just seem so slimy I just can’t bring myself to do it, even if they were a publicy traded company.

Insert witty title about 10 new XBLA games here

I really tried to come up with some witty title about how of the ten new games being released on Live soon and how I might buy one of them. Looks like a lot of schlock  to me. I’m pretty happy about Worms though. Maybe.

The Games

I noticed Mumbo Jumbo on that list. I still wonder what the heck the Ritual guys are going to do for them…

What Would Matt Do: Maybe make my first ever XBLA purchase when Worms finally appears.

Another day, another Sony blunder.

This is just quick question. Which do you think looks better, PGR3 or GT HD? You might be surprised to know Sony agrees with me, it’s PGR 3.

I kid you not. 

I probably shouldn’t say anything, so I most definitely will.

Remember a bit back when I said, “These guys seem pretty smart.“? Well, apparently not everyone agrees. I was reading Raph’s comments on it earlier today:

It’s a sensationalistic headline and tagline for an argument that isn’t actually about SL itself but about how some folks may be using SL.

Which is a perfectly fair assessment, but doesn’t really need further commenting after he finished up with:

The bottom line is that going into SL, or indeed any world, purely on the basis of RMT and money to be made is probably a bad idea. The reliable returns for the average Western person just aren’t there in any of the worlds. This doesn’t mean that the world operators are necessarily running a pyramid scheme themselves, and I think it’s irresponsible to say so. But it does mean that anyone looking to make a buck should assume they are the sucker, and be pleasantly surprised if it turns out otherwise.

Which is really just a cool way of agree with me when I said you shouldn’t be trying to make money from SL.

But is any of that worth commenting on? Not really. Raph is pretty straight foward and pretty right on.

Then I read the link he posted in his post to 3pointD.com. I can’t say they were as fair…

His main complaint is that the currency exchange market isn’t liquid enough for someone to be able to cash out large amounts of L$ at current rates. Moving large volumes of currency results in a fall in the value you actually receive for your L$. This doesn’t make SL a Ponzi scheme; it simply means there’s not a lot of liquidity in the market. Large currency moves in real-world economies that can’t handle them often result in the same thing. The problem — and it’s a real one — is that Linden Lab advertises SL as an economy as robust as any mature real-world economy. It simply isn’t yet. But neither is it a scam.

I haven’t reread the article, but I don’t remember where he said it was SL’s scam, just that the economy in SL was a scam. That is doesn’t have the real world comforts we’ve come to expect in American money markets (insured money, for one) is very true and I agree with their assertment that Linden Labs shouldn’t be advertising their market as the real thing. It’s not.

But then go on to stir up and basically call Valleywag silly bastards. Or the original blogger, I’m not sure. Either way, they might have sounded a bit less biased if they hadn’t littered the article with personal attacks.

Even that though, I let it go. I don’t care either way. It’s SL and some website I’ve never heard of and Valleywag. What’s to care about…see, then Au got involved. And while I said he makes SL sound cool, he is anything but unbiased and probably should have stayed out of this one. I, for one, am glad he didn’t though. It makes for very fun quotes like this:

Even at a brief glance, however, it reads like a Soviet economist trying to figure out how Wall Street works.

I mean, can you ask for better lines than that? Really. He spends most of the article mentioning how factually wrong the article is, even though his facts don’t really make it sound that wrong, just a little bit off. Mostly he just comes across as a Homer. That any talk of SL not being gods gift to man is completely unfounded and shouldn’t dare to be blasphemied across the universe. It’s to be expected, I guess, and it’s pretty funny. And even though he says up front he might be biased, it’s pretty eviden it’s not just might. He’s so far lost in SL that he talk about the freebies Linden Labs gives away as if they are something anything not a n00b uses (again, I’m not 100% sure on this, as I don’t play. Just what I’ve heard).

The main point is this. If SL is such a good thing and not over hyped and doesn’t need the defense, why are so many people getting their panties in twist over some enonomist saying it’s a pyrmid scheme? Why? Because it partially is. Maybe not by Linden Labs fault, but it definitely works out like that if you are trying to make money in SL and you aren’t one of the already established big boys. That’s not a good thing.

Oh, and a side note, that Au quotes the “usage” numbers in article that Linden Labs released as gospel is pretty funny. Because they are pretty obviously junk and have already been debunked as such.

What Would Matt Do: Again, I wonder if maybe I shouldn’t be giving my money away to SL. Nah, it sounds like I’ll have to spend a lot of time defending the game instead of playing… Note, this story is an oldie, but possibly a prophetic goodie.

Next Page »